MSI 870A-G54 (FX)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7599
MotherboardMSI 870A-G54 (FX)  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121127
Uptime38.3 Days
Run DateApr 04 '24 at 11:34
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 56.5
2-Core 78.3
49% 72.4 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 334
34% 272 Pts
64-Core 336
21% 336 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6970
MSI(1462 2370) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Lighting 34.8
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 31.6
28% 32.9 fps
MRender 25.8
Gravity 28.1
Splatting 20.7
20% 24.9 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 324 315 300 305 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 365
Write 320
Mixed 331
SusWrite 307
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 41.7
4K Mixed 24.4
88% 29.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 60.6
DQ Mixed 35.7
30% 42.1 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 CL9-10-9 DDR3-1866 CL9-10-9 DDR3-1866 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.9% Average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 17.4
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.9
SC Mixed 13.2
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 53 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA0D8 DELL P2217H
Typical 870A-G54 (FX) Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI 870A-G54 (FX)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback