Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics99% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X  (all builds)
Memory20.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 22:40
Run Duration247 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 137
2-Core 266
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 882
83% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,374
85% 1,374 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$250
Gigabyte(1458 2316) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 197
Parallax 208
102% 177 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 142
Splatting 94.3
93% 116 fps
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS500G2B0C 500GB
25GB free
Firmware: 211210WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,560
Write 1,624
Mixed 1,277
332% 1,487 MB/s
4K Read 48.9
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 67.2
231% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 956
DQ Write 614
DQ Mixed 606
500% 725 MB/s
Poor: 118% Great: 238%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,564
Write 2418
Mixed 1,812
504% 2,265 MB/s
4K Read 63.8
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 82.8
273% 93 MB/s
DQ Read 908
DQ Write 544
DQ Mixed 717
536% 723 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
INTENSO 256GB
73GB free
Firmware: V0609A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 135 66 154 140 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 500
Write 420
Mixed 428
SusWrite 176
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 31.7
145% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 51.6
78% 148 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 100%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
250GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 444 444 444 444 443 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 447
Mixed 443
SusWrite 442
103% 458 MB/s
4K Read 43
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 54.5
178% 59.7 MB/s
DQ Read 251
DQ Write 197
DQ Mixed 192
152% 214 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 113%
Great: 137%
WD Elements 25A1 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 100 99 101 99 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 107
Write 98.6
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 99.2
126% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 6.9
4K Mixed 0.5
255% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 33.9
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 30.6
71% 25 GB/s
Latency 84.2
48% 84.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 27" 1280 720 MSI3FA7 MSI MAG271CQR
Typical GA-X570 GAMING X Builds (Compare 3,963 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 GAMING X

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $820
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback