MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220901
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateJul 18 '23 at 18:54
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 62.5
1-Core 139
2-Core 262
82% 155 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 856
82% 677 Pts
64-Core 1,323
82% 1,323 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
EVGA(3842 2959) 2GB
CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Lighting 33.6
Reflection 37.3
Parallax 30.7
27% 33.9 fps
MRender 32.9
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 29.3
26% 31.6 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2272 1880 1899 1928 1925 1943 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,891
Write 2,351
Mixed 2,122
SusWrite 1,974
472% 2,085 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 60.1
198% 65.4 MB/s
DQ Read 959
DQ Write 780
DQ Mixed 920
675% 886 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 296%
Great: 477%
Sandisk S3 1T02 1TB
911GB free
Firmware: 40101000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 350 355 352 351 353 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 304
Write 333
Mixed 267
SusWrite 351
71% 314 MB/s
4K Read 27.7
4K Write 51
4K Mixed 29.2
106% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 249
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 213
162% 220 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 122%
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
924GB free
Firmware: 101200RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1728 1390 1399 1396 1391 1397 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
236% Outstanding
Read 1,504
Write 1,628
Mixed 1,458
SusWrite 1,450
341% 1,510 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 43.5
152% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 956
706% 931 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 236%
Great: 337%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB
6.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 134 136 137 140 134 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 162
Write 127
Mixed 105
SusWrite 136
174% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1
207% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FA 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 25fa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 106 105 107 104 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 110
Write 99
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 105
126% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.2
51% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.1% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 25.3
64% 22.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.6
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 22.3
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27.2" 1920 1080 HWP3038 HP 27xi
Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,786 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,043
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback