Acer Nitro AN515-57

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-57  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Scala_TLS
Memory6.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230706
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 22:16
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
48.2% Average
Memory 46
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 148
50% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 517
47% 394 Pts
64-Core 667
41% 667 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1539) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
2.33% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.9
2% 2.6 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 4
3% 3.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.33%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM256GD3JX016N 256GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,054
Write 1,798
Mixed 560
324% 1,471 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 43.4
148% 52.7 MB/s
DQ Read 510
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 420
305% 402 MB/s
Poor: 131% Great: 291%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
248GB free
Firmware: JU002J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 99 111 107 107 105 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 131
Write 139
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 106
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 6
4K Mixed 0.6
228% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
42.1% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 8
25% 8.77 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 54 144 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical Nitro AN515-57 Builds (Compare 15,240 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback