Today's hottest deals

Hopesa-rsppof MS-7C91

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 193%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics164% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive319% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHopesa-rsppof MS-7C91  (all builds)
Motherboard49001HP-TRGT11788FA MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)
Memory55 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:49
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$220
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 176
2-Core 349
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 680
8-Core 1,273
117% 977 Pts
64-Core 2,316
143% 2,316 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$430
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
164% Outstanding
Lighting 244
Reflection 217
Parallax 212
199% 225 fps
MRender 256
Gravity 159
Splatting 130
142% 182 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 164%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$55
251GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1130 884 868 856 840 836 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
319% Outstanding
Read 2,675
Write 2,481
Mixed 1,900
SusWrite 902
445% 1,989 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 95.8
325% 116 MB/s
DQ Read 1,397
DQ Write 1,124
DQ Mixed 1230
929% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 319%
Great: 346%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
853GB free
Firmware: SBFKK1C3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 468 465 465 462 460 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 393
Write 290
Mixed 352
SusWrite 464
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 41
150% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 256
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 211
186% 275 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 104%
Great: 102%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
95GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,749
Write 1,709
Mixed 1,694
384% 1,717 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 146
4K Mixed 81.5
270% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,488
DQ Write 1,190
DQ Mixed 1311
989% 1,330 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G4DFD824A.M16FB 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 74.7
MC Write 35.6
MC Mixed 37.1
140% 49.1 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 36.4
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 128%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 0P 5R 5G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 8% 12 215 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7080 LC32G5xT
History: Score 1: 0P 0R 0G 1B | Score 47: 0P 5R 5G 7B
Typical MS-7C91 Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

System: Hopesa-rsppof MS-7C91

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $433
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback