Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231007
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 18:36
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 170
2-Core 335
102% 194 Pts
4-Core 637
8-Core 1,083
104% 860 Pts
64-Core 1,368
85% 1,368 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$460
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.29
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 220
Reflection 270
Parallax 183
180% 224 fps
MRender 209
Gravity 157
Splatting 140
134% 169 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$80
273GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,999
Write 2,078
Mixed 1,732
433% 1,936 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 51.6
166% 55.2 MB/s
DQ Read 640
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 499
375% 508 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 347%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$90
820GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 439
Mixed 427
101% 453 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 55.6
4K Mixed 39.6
128% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 210
158% 212 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 155
Mixed 80.1
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.9
272% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$50
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 69
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 96%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
6TB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 177
Write 157
Mixed 92.9
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
612% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.6% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 27.2
72% 25.2 GB/s
SC Read 24.9
SC Write 17.8
SC Mixed 27.7
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 29 60 84.6" 1280 720 MJI0051 marantz-AVR
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,314 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $109

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $875
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback