Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire A515-56

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.66% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A515-56  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Iris_TL
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220314
Uptime20 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 08:44
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 208
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 399
44% 348 Pts
64-Core 400
25% 400 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Acer(1025 1464) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 12.4
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 3.9
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 0.2
3% 3.97 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 5.66%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GDJTNI-82A0A 512GB
340GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11000C00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 335 333 283 234 177 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 616
Write 326
Mixed 304
SusWrite 282
85% 382 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 59.5
191% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 572
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 459
341% 458 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 122%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.4% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 14.3
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 58 32 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUODF87
Typical Aspire A515-56 Builds (Compare 2,450 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A515-56

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback