Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 171%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 225%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 115%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX  (all builds)
Memory85.5 GB free of 96 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 08:35
Run Duration370 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$522
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Memory 75
1-Core 211
2-Core 418
120% 235 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,617
144% 1,219 Pts
64-Core 3,704
229% 3,704 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 115%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$460
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 224
Reflection 203
Parallax 201
183% 209 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 147
Splatting 129
123% 153 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 150%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 153 64 69 109 29 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 406
Write 262
Mixed 274
SusWrite 113
59% 264 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 82.1
4K Mixed 35.4
135% 49.3 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 154
131% 198 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 88%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
279GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1721 1462 1366 1324 1325 1285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
346% Outstanding
Read 2,345
Write 2,278
Mixed 1,809
SusWrite 1,414
440% 1,961 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 85.5
292% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,821
DQ Write 1,588
DQ Mixed 1,732
1,291% 1,714 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 346%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
331GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1794 1583 1595 1593 1599 1603 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,205
Write 2,314
Mixed 1,763
SusWrite 1,628
445% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 59.4
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 95.4
311% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 1,996
DQ Write 1,658
DQ Mixed 1,786
1,349% 1,813 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 366%
Great: 410%
Crucial BX500 960GB-$54
561GB free
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 434 429 425 435 427 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Read 472
Write 435
Mixed 374
SusWrite 432
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 25.2
135% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 35.3
89% 182 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 91%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$171
618GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2792 2954 2949 2964 1415 1327 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
444% Outstanding
Read 2,742
Write 3,217
Mixed 2,883
SusWrite 2,400
635% 2,811 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 100
343% 126 MB/s
DQ Read 2019
DQ Write 1,646
DQ Mixed 1,808
1,360% 1,824 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 444%
Great: 508%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH96GX5M2B5600C40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5600 MHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
169% Outstanding
MC Read 66.5
MC Write 58.1
MC Mixed 58.6
174% 61.1 GB/s
SC Read 52.3
SC Write 65
SC Mixed 57
166% 58.1 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 132%
This bench: 169%
Great: 219%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
28% 25% 64 218 58 144 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
History: Score 28: 0P 2R 2G 12B | Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 218%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 222%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 125% - Outstanding Total price: $1,118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback