Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 08:20
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 99.4
2-Core 192
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 496
49% 402 Pts
64-Core 496
31% 496 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1349 MHz, MLim: 1903 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 64
Parallax 85.5
52% 71.1 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 46.5
48% 60.3 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lite-on IT CORP. 128GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 352
Write 403
Mixed 329
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 30.1
101% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 95.8
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 142
123% 175 MB/s
Poor: 69% Great: 80%
Intel SSDSCKKF180H6H 180GB
73GB free
Firmware: LSF034N
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 469
Write 393
Mixed 380
92% 414 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 34.5
122% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 283
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 240
198% 283 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 88%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
112GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 136
Mixed 68.9
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
216% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
DISK 32GB
25GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.9
Write 13
Mixed 8.9
18% 17.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 830B M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 17.8
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 19" 1280 720 HWP3022 HP LA1956x
Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback