Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 15:51
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1230 V2-$266
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
74.1% Very good
Memory 90.5
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 192
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 313
8-Core 490
50% 401 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Device(7377 0000) 2GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1520 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 24.1
Reflection 27
Parallax 32.6
20% 27.9 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 31.2
Splatting 25.7
24% 30.3 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lite-on IT CORP. 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G5A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 409 269 151 98 87 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Read 320
Write 406
Mixed 337
SusWrite 238
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 33.2
122% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 81.9
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 144
122% 170 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 830B M2F4G64CB8HG4N-DI HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.1% Above average
MC Read 22.4
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 17
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 66.6
60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 61 46 60 19" 1280 720 HWP3022 HP LA1956x
Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,679 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback