Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics77.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 04:25
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$117
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 138
2-Core 243
86% 154 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 836
78% 651 Pts
64-Core 1,019
63% 1,019 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.12.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.5% Very good
Lighting 77.7
Reflection 121
Parallax 147
63% 115 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 82.2
Splatting 135
105% 128 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 1TB SSD 1TB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 303 521 451 328 127 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 738
Write 95.1
Mixed 178
SusWrite 339
74% 338 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 20.7
102% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 236
192% 267 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 383%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$75
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 164 172 162 165 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 108
Write 160
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 166
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
105% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 34.1
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 31.1
SC Mixed 24.7
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 240 21.7" 1920 1009 GSM5B8D 27GN7
Typical TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI Builds (Compare 6,988 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B560M-PLUS WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $502
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback