Colorful H610M-E M.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive217% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemColorful H610M-E M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H610M-E M.2
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:56
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 80
1-Core 162
2-Core 309
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 948
91% 751 Pts
64-Core 1,176
73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB; colorful geforce rtx 4060 mini 8gb V
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 171
Reflection 116
Parallax 161
139% 149 fps
MRender 206
Gravity 134
Splatting 108
117% 149 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 126%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FPL1000G 1TB
816GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 974 983 1011 1026 1029 1019 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
217% Outstanding
Read 1,152
Write 1016
Mixed 850
SusWrite 1007
226% 1,006 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 60.1
218% 82.4 MB/s
DQ Read 941
DQ Write 981
DQ Mixed 956
720% 959 MB/s
Poor: 163%
This bench: 217%
Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 17.5
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 19.4
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 78.1
51% 78.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 23.5" 1920 1009 GSM5A53 24M45
Typical H610M-E M.2 Builds (Compare 74 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Colorful H610M-E M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback