Colorful H610M-E M.2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemColorful H610M-E M.2  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful H610M-E M.2
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:44
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400F-$98
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 77.9
1-Core 160
2-Core 313
98% 184 Pts
4-Core 574
8-Core 916
91% 745 Pts
64-Core 1,119
69% 1,119 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$293
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.61
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 114
Parallax 159
137% 147 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 133
Splatting 107
115% 146 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 123%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force TM8FPL1000G 1TB
824GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFMC0.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,342
Write 2,345
Mixed 1,751
409% 1,813 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 63.2
217% 79.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,325
DQ Write 962
DQ Mixed 1,148
857% 1,145 MB/s
Poor: 163% Great: 352%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 17.4
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 16: 0P 2R 1G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
16% 15% 40 214 58 60 23.5" 1280 720 GSM5A53 24M45
Typical H610M-E M.2 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

System: Colorful H610M-E M.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $332
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback