Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive48.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory17.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230904
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:44
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
66.5% Good
Memory 70.2
1-Core 114
2-Core 182
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 605
57% 472 Pts
64-Core 602
37% 602 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 66.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 14 28 15 124 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
48.2% Average
Read 444
Write 355
Mixed 232
SusWrite 87.5
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 18.6
68% 24.2 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 15.8
32% 66 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
74GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 60 63 64 61 61 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 81.7
Write 72.7
Mixed 47.8
SusWrite 61.7
49% 66 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 63%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
785GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 95 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 216
Write 162
Mixed 90.7
SusWrite 93.6
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 Kingston KF432C16BB/8 Kingston KHX3000C15D4/8GX 24GB
2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.7% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 19.1
56% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 21.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 18: 0P 1R 2G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
18% 13% 77 176 14 60 0" 1280 720
Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,152 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 134% - Outstanding Total price: $282
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback