MSI MS-16P5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics51.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive198% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8RE
MotherboardMSI MS-16P5  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:41
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 88.6
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 595
65% 514 Pts
64-Core 779
48% 779 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 84%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1214) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 71.7
Parallax 64.1
51% 66.1 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 64.4
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM610PRO 1TB
580GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9442
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1579 1532 1597 1283 1229 1215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
198% Outstanding
Read 912
Write 1,252
Mixed 985
SusWrite 1,406
258% 1,139 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 74.1
4K Mixed 43.8
147% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 842
DQ Write 537
DQ Mixed 679
509% 686 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 198%
Great: 328%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 04CB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
78.9% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.8
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 23.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 78.9%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2723 VG27A
Typical MS-16P5 Builds (Compare 1,658 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback