Acer Aspire A715-42G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire A715-42G  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Azalea_CAS
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220728
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 03:13
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 73
1-Core 132
2-Core 264
84% 156 Pts
4-Core 489
8-Core 756
77% 622 Pts
64-Core 906
56% 906 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 82%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1524) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 25.1
12% 18.3 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 22.1
Splatting 20
14% 16.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,239
Write 2,104
Mixed 1,683
447% 2,009 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 61.4
195% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,086
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 928
701% 945 MB/s
Poor: 132% Great: 322%
SSD 128G B 128GB
22GB free
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 35 36 35 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.3% Very poor
Read 54.7
Write 35.5
Mixed 37.6
SusWrite 34.6
9% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 10.7
4K Mixed 9.2
46% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 30.5
DQ Write 30
DQ Mixed 13
14% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/16G 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 12.5
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 16.2
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 92.1
44% 92.1 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUODF87
Typical Aspire A715-42G Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-42G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $98Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback