Acer Swift SFX14-41G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics9.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SFX14-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardLN Orion_CA
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210806
Uptime9.2 Days
Run DateApr 12 '23 at 13:12
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5500U
FP6, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 54
1-Core 62.9
2-Core 121
46% 79.2 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 333
35% 278 Pts
64-Core 432
27% 432 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Acer(1025 1536) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.32
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
9.36% Terrible
Lighting 7.7
Reflection 52.9
Parallax 10.9
6% 23.8 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 22.5
Splatting 20.2
15% 18.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.36%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM512GD3JX016N 512GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41020C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 506 355 342 345 336 317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1548
Write 1,346
Mixed 1,261
SusWrite 367
253% 1,131 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 30.2
98% 30.8 MB/s
DQ Read 542
DQ Write 229
DQ Mixed 462
322% 411 MB/s
Poor: 132%
This bench: 132%
Great: 322%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB LPDDR4 clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
50.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 17.8
53% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 12.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 147
27% 147 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Swift SFX14-41G Builds (Compare 454 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Acer Swift SFX14-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback