Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '24 at 02:05
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 60.8
2-Core 99
52% 80.5 Pts
4-Core 179
8-Core 326
30% 253 Pts
64-Core 330
20% 330 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 89.6
Parallax 76.8
76% 86.6 fps
MRender 65.5
Gravity 80.6
Splatting 71.8
60% 72.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 372 414 415 411 409 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 430
Mixed 370
SusWrite 387
92% 407 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 40.5
138% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 260
196% 261 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 134%
WD Green SN350 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 673 833 957 939 904 890 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 1,239
Write 1,066
Mixed 1089
SusWrite 866
239% 1,065 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 54
177% 60 MB/s
DQ Read 449
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 403
294% 387 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 175%
Great: 382%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 5G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 18% 49 444 282 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELA097 DELL P2214H
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback