Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics65.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock 970M Pro3  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160617
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 10:05
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 77.1
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 95.2
50% 77.5 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 331
31% 258 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
65.3% Good
Lighting 85.1
Reflection 82
Parallax 71
69% 79.4 fps
MRender 62.6
Gravity 77.6
Splatting 69.6
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 370 380 338 365 374 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 309
Write 288
Mixed 264
SusWrite 356
69% 304 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 27.5
4K Mixed 19.1
62% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 273
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 257
193% 257 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 134%
WD Green SN350 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 33006000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 654 775 845 705 742 751 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 664
Write 571
Mixed 585
SusWrite 745
145% 641 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 30
4K Mixed 24.5
76% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 397
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 374
273% 358 MB/s
Poor: 168%
This bench: 111%
Great: 382%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 10.9
26% 9.1 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 15% 33 188 9 60 21.5" 1920 1017 DELA097 DELL P2214H
Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 845 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $217
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback