Acer Swift SF314-56G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Swift SF314-56G  (all builds)
MotherboardWL Strongbow_WL
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190104
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 21:54
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 79.9
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 414
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 321
20% 321 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Acer(1025 1301) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6577
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.29% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 5
Parallax 5.6
4% 5.03 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.9
6% 6.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.29%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$57
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 32B3T8EA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 283 463 455 412 468 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,401
Write 972
Mixed 1,026
SusWrite 399
212% 950 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 76.7
4K Mixed 53.6
177% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 566
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 342
278% 401 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 155%
Great: 311%
Toshiba MQ04ABF100 1TB
455GB free
Firmware: JU001J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 104 105 89 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 138
Write 140
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 101
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.6
218% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.6% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 15.6
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 18% 17 163 55 60 14" 1280 720 LGD05F6
Typical Swift SF314-56G Builds (Compare 177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Swift SF314-56G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback