Lenovo 20351

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20351  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lancer 5A2
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140402
Uptime199.5 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 20:03
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 39%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4210U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 82.6
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 99.1
52% 80.6 Pts
4-Core 168
8-Core 169
23% 169 Pts
64-Core 167
10% 167 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Mobile 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
2.75% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 5.6
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.2
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.75%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Jmicron Tech 500GB
362GB free
Firmware: 0212
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 322
Write 327
Mixed 315
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 28.2
4K Mixed 25.3
84% 25.8 MB/s
DQ Read 65.9
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 29.3
31% 52.2 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 93%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002LVM1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 58
Write 50.7
Mixed 40
37% 49.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMT3170EF68F9W1600 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.1% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 15
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 14.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 179 145 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO40EC
Typical 20351 Builds (Compare 1,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20351

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback