Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.36% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EAU
Memory0.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 10:43
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 197
63% 118 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 412
46% 362 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1B72) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.36% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 13.2
7% 10.4 fps
MRender 8.9
Gravity 12.7
Splatting 7.4
8% 9.67 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.36%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0SA6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 262 404 205 258 237 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 711
Write 818
Mixed 626
SusWrite 280
137% 609 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 90.6
4K Mixed 28.6
135% 50.8 MB/s
DQ Read 531
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 345
266% 372 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 103%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
26.5% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 7
27% 9.4 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 4.4
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 190
21% 190 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 37%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 49 21 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE0946
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA Builds (Compare 259 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EAU_R565EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback