Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 372%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 510%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 130%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics300% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive181% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory54.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240315
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 02 '24 at 10:35
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-14900K-$490
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 5.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 236
2-Core 476
134% 264 Pts
4-Core 955
8-Core 1,868
167% 1,412 Pts
64-Core 4,542
281% 4,542 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 130%
Great: 137%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4080-$970
Asus(1043 8900) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5600 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
300% Outstanding
Lighting 450
Reflection 436
Parallax 509
367% 465 fps
MRender 564
Gravity 379
Splatting 270
315% 404 fps
Poor: 263%
This bench: 300%
Great: 305%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Corsair MP600 CORE XT 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3009 334 435 343 195 268 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
181% Outstanding
Read 1,727
Write 738
Mixed 92.7
SusWrite 764
182% 830 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 2.4
115% 35.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,408
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 276
328% 609 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 181%
Great: 514%
Nvme Samsung SSD 960 PRO 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1408 1548 1541 1455 1448 1445 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2454
Write 1,332
Mixed 918
SusWrite 1,474
343% 1,544 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 48
158% 48.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,514
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 266
338% 645 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 274%
Great: 352%
Nvme Corsair MP600 CORE XT 2TB
834GB free
Firmware: ELFMC1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2870 139 262 199 196 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
215% Outstanding
Read 2,097
Write 2,992
Mixed 2,025
SusWrite 644
437% 1,940 MB/s
4K Read 47.6
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 58.4
171% 50.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,541
DQ Write 136
DQ Mixed 223
318% 633 MB/s
Poor: 150%
This bench: 215%
Great: 514%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149
3.5TB free
Firmware: DN03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 212 215 212 213 211 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH64GX5M2B5600C36 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
166% Outstanding
MC Read 66.5
MC Write 66
MC Mixed 62.1
185% 64.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 52.1
SC Mixed 33
101% 35.2 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 166%
Great: 198%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM7707 LG HDR 4K
Typical ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 2,206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 453%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 125%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 596%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z790-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $2,374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback