Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 135%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 137%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive344% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 15:49
Run Duration246 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 78.2
1-Core 176
2-Core 351
106% 202 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,165
112% 923 Pts
64-Core 1,555
96% 1,555 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
XFX(1EAE 6710) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Lighting 152
Reflection 141
Parallax 311
124% 201 fps
MRender 266
Gravity 155
Splatting 214
172% 212 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 132%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-512M10PGN 512GB
356GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1916 756 810 782 771 1305 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
344% Outstanding
Read 2,949
Write 3,593
Mixed 2,721
SusWrite 1,057
580% 2,580 MB/s
4K Read 75.6
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 106
361% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 1,295
DQ Write 914
DQ Mixed 1,172
857% 1,127 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 344%
Great: 437%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
573GB free
Firmware: S3402101
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 365
Mixed 398
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 90.9
4K Mixed 30.1
127% 49.2 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 114
108% 170 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
776GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 386
Write 415
Mixed 382
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 92.7
4K Mixed 51.9
179% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 154
132% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Adata DashDrive UV128 USB 3.0 32GB-$11
18GB free, PID db8a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 23.7
Mixed 16.5
44% 47 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.6
101% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.4% Very good
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 28.7
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 18
SC Mixed 29.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 144 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32B1 ASUS XG32V
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,009
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback