Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 132%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '23 at 18:10
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 80.3
1-Core 171
2-Core 345
105% 199 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1,154
110% 912 Pts
64-Core 1,532
95% 1,532 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 103%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6750-XT
XFX(1EAE 6710) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.9.1
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 144
Reflection 140
Parallax 310
117% 198 fps
MRender 267
Gravity 156
Splatting 212
172% 211 fps
Poor: 124%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor PX-512M10PGN 512GB
360GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2134 818 785 722 753 1160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,927
Write 3,736
Mixed 2,669
SusWrite 1,062
585% 2,598 MB/s
4K Read 67.3
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 83.8
312% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,306
DQ Write 929
DQ Mixed 1182
866% 1,139 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 327%
Great: 437%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
575GB free
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 386 422 420 423 426 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 500
Write 337
Mixed 373
SusWrite 411
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 26.8
116% 44.3 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 112
101% 152 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 102%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
779GB free
Firmware: M3CR043
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 387 420 418 421 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 294
Write 382
Mixed 297
SusWrite 413
78% 346 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 44.1
146% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 153
132% 194 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 92%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 28.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 26.2
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 29.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 31.5" 1280 720 AUS32B1 ASUS XG32V
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback