Dell Latitude 5491

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude 5491  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0VK7YF
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231101
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateApr 01 '24 at 04:59
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 66.2
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 110
52% 85.1 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 221
24% 192 Pts
64-Core 230
14% 230 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 89%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssdpekkf256g8 NVMe INTEL 256GB
57GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D05N Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 178 157 139 180 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 1339
Write 570
Mixed 751
SusWrite 176
156% 709 MB/s
4K Read 18.5
4K Write 50
4K Mixed 26.3
88% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 199
149% 202 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 101%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 802C0000802C 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1B1 16GB
2667, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.6% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 17.2
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 65 53 60 0" 1280 720
Typical Latitude 5491 Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude 5491

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback