MSI MS-17E1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive82.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star GE75 Raider 8RF
MotherboardMSI MS-17E1  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 31 '24 at 20:27
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.8% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 170
70% 117 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 406
44% 349 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1266) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.5186
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Lighting 94.8
Reflection 121
Parallax 95.3
77% 104 fps
MRender 92
Gravity 95.2
Splatting 102
80% 96.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 436 177 165 164 166 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 488
Write 424
Mixed 460
SusWrite 212
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 29.4
96% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 528
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 475
351% 466 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 126%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
34GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 118 117 117 113 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
60.8% Good
Read 95.1
Write 102
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 117
61% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 75%
Adata SD700 512GB
56GB free
Firmware: 9301
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 379 378 373 378 383 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 16% Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
69.2% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 24.5
MC Mixed 20.5
68% 24 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 22.4
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 144 17.3" 1280 720 AUO978F
Typical MS-17E1 Builds (Compare 71 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-17E1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback