HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	24.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (71%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory	6.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130814
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 31 '24 at 10:58
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	71%

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670-$51 49,019 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	46% Average	Memory 65.2 1-Core 62.3 2-Core 103 48% 76.8 Pts	4-Core 146 8-Core 240 24% 193 Pts	64-Core 196 12% 196 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101 269,381 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 551.86 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	14.4% Very poor	Lighting 19 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 14 16% 12.2 fps	MRender 17.6 Gravity 17.7 Splatting 11.7 12% 15.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 13GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 59 55 31 46 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	24.3% Poor	Read 339 Write 192 Mixed 266 SusWrite 56.1 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 12.7 20% 6.4 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 90%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$103 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 429GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 278 319 306 297 303 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 274 Write 320 Mixed 311 SusWrite 297 68% 300 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 28.8 4K Mixed 19.5 66% 21.7 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 259 198% 270 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.3% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 13.6 42% 14.5 GB/s	SC Read 4.8 SC Write 8.5 SC Mixed 7.5 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	38	18	60	27"	1280 720	HPN354B HP 27f

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

CPU
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	851x
Core i5-4570Intel $99Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	769x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	756x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,206x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	371x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	250x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	185x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	60x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	56x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 51%, 8,612 samples	54x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	46x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	44x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16