Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515EA
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230602
Uptime18 Days
Run DateMar 30 '24 at 09:39
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52.7% Above average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 104
2-Core 182
61% 112 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 417
45% 357 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 15CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.94% Terrible
Lighting 8.5
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 10.4
7% 8.47 fps
MRender 8
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 6.6
7% 8.73 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.94%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVL4256HBJD-00BTW 256GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 509 483 525 494 542 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 961
Write 780
Mixed 772
SusWrite 499
169% 753 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 59.1
152% 53.1 MB/s
DQ Read 448
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 303
228% 312 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 132%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
30.9% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 11.3
MC Mixed 8.4
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 160
25% 160 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 0P 5R 3G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 39% 23 70 57 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA Builds (Compare 2,344 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515EA_X515EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback