Asrock B450M Pro4 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 1 month ago.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory21.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220301
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 22:20
Run Duration317 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$159
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 87.1
1-Core 175
2-Core 338
107% 200 Pts
4-Core 652
8-Core 1,185
110% 919 Pts
64-Core 1,431
89% 1,431 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 503
Write 490
Mixed 406
104% 466 MB/s
4K Read 45.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 59.9
201% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 365
276% 370 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 115%
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 4TB-$325
2.5TB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2632 2657 2648 2647 2662 2648 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
449% Outstanding
Read 2,878
Write 2,641
Mixed 2,505
SusWrite 2649
601% 2,668 MB/s
4K Read 80.8
4K Write 201
4K Mixed 119
381% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,336
DQ Write 1,049
DQ Mixed 1,161
877% 1,182 MB/s
Poor: 315%
This bench: 449%
Great: 616%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
17TB free
Firmware: SC03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 259 261 260 264 260 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 264
Write 257
Mixed 124
SusWrite 260
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 20.9
4K Mixed 0
83% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 4
DQ Write 16.6
DQ Mixed 0.3
3% 6.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 47%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
13TB free
Firmware: SC03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 243 244 243 248 242 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 246
Write 250
Mixed 126
SusWrite 244
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 42
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 1.1
75% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 5.3
DQ Write 17.1
DQ Mixed 0.3
3% 7.57 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 47%
ST20000NM007D-3DJ103 20TB
13.5TB free
Firmware: SC03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 244 247 246 248 249 245 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 251
Write 261
Mixed 137
SusWrite 246
50% 224 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 1.1
68% 19.2 MB/s
DQ Read 5.8
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 0.7
4% 7.77 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 47%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 123 123 121 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 140
Write 142
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 123
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 86%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 82 81 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 135
Write 144
Mixed 95.3
SusWrite 81.2
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 0.9
179% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 100%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
3.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 35 35 35 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$82
2TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 144 142 142 145 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 170
Write 147
Mixed 109
SusWrite 143
105% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
196% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 35.9
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 30.6
SC Write 23.8
SC Mixed 38.3
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 0" 1280 720
Typical B450M Pro4 R2.0 Builds (Compare 698 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4 R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $388
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback