Alienware m17 R3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive138% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAlienware m17 R3  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware Alienware m17 R3
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 29 '24 at 09:47
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 90.6
1-Core 130
2-Core 241
87% 154 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 728
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 905
56% 905 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super Mobile)
Dell(1028 09CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 127
Reflection 144
Parallax 134
104% 135 fps
MRender 184
Gravity 114
Splatting 110
108% 136 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC SN730 WD 512GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11170012 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 872 536 540 515 505 512 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
138% Outstanding
Read 1,406
Write 1,546
Mixed 1480
SusWrite 580
282% 1,253 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 20.9
101% 32.2 MB/s
DQ Read 366
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 499
340% 413 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 138%
Great: 260%
Pm9a1 NVMe Samsung 512GB
20GB free
Firmware: 36310029 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,690
Write 1573
Mixed 1,647
366% 1,637 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 50.5
164% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 561
DQ Write 664
DQ Mixed 584
448% 603 MB/s
Poor: 151% Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.2% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 25.9
MC Mixed 22.3
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 12: 0P 2R 0G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
12% 57% 7 213 56 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUOBE8E
Typical m17 R3 Builds (Compare 309 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser

System: Alienware m17 R3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback