Mm-vision Computer

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Mm-vision Computer (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING (WI-FI)
Memory	25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181107
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 29 '24 at 07:15
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	Memory 94.1 1-Core 144 2-Core 285 96% 175 Pts	4-Core 564 8-Core 1,048 96% 806 Pts	64-Core 1,496 93% 1,496 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Asus(1043 8670) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 551.86 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Lighting 137 Reflection 117 Parallax 132 111% 128 fps	MRender 175 Gravity 131 Splatting 110 110% 138 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,275 Write 1,978 Mixed 1,378 417% 1877 MB/s	4K Read 49.1 4K Write 88.4 4K Mixed 62.4 201% 66.6 MB/s	DQ Read 996 DQ Write 679 DQ Mixed 876 643% 850 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 372%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$165 41,734 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 217GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 472 241 161 164 162 162 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Read 507 Write 481 Mixed 435 SusWrite 227 92% 412 MB/s	4K Read 34.3 4K Write 77 4K Mixed 45.5 151% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 32GB 141 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 3000, 3000, 3000, 3000 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	93.8% Outstanding	MC Read 35 MC Write 36.1 MC Mixed 28 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 21.1 SC Write 40.1 SC Mixed 29.6 86% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 61 66% 61 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 93.8% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	144	31.5"	1280 720	MSI3DA4 MAG322CQRV

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Computer Builds (Compare 1,674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 63%

Destroyer

System: Mm-vision Computer

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	237x
Core i7-9700KFIntel $218Bench 97%, 32,736 samples	152x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	151x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	307x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	189x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	134x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBIntel $70Bench 191%, 163,917 samples	414x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	199x
SSDPEKNW010T9 1TBIntelBench 216%, 20,963 samples	160x

RAM
CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 1x16GBCorsairBench 46%, 1,910 samples	357x
CM4X16GC3000C16K4D 2x16GBCorsairBench 89%, 1,112 samples	136x
CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 2x16GBCorsairBench 92%, 1,713 samples	98x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $443

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16