Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 222%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics222% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive75.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory45.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 20:59
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 91.6
1-Core 171
2-Core 325
106% 196 Pts
4-Core 607
8-Core 946
96% 777 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
EVGA(3842 3982) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
222% Outstanding
Lighting 333
Reflection 301
Parallax 365
271% 333 fps
MRender 371
Gravity 262
Splatting 188
214% 274 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 222%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS 100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 235 339 267 340 352 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 455
Write 395
Mixed 242
SusWrite 306
78% 350 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 21
99% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 160
129% 183 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 107%
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2587 2985 3000 2966 2963 2993 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
442% Outstanding
Read 4,161
Write 3,291
Mixed 2,574
SusWrite 2,916
725% 3,235 MB/s
4K Read 55.9
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 61.6
203% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,367
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 336
356% 625 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 442%
Great: 633%
WDC WDS 400T1R0A-68A4W0 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 4110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 356 346 349 342 382 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
84.7% Excellent
Read 464
Write 352
Mixed 286
SusWrite 357
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 35.3
115% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 189
141% 188 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 414 418 413 432 432 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 427
Mixed 428
SusWrite 421
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 44.7
148% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 199
143% 186 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$371
3.5TB free
Firmware: SVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 413 417 412 432 431 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 432
Mixed 436
SusWrite 420
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 43.7
144% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 224
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 201
142% 182 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
103% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 40.2
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 32.9
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 39.8
95% 33.1 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 103%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 3 213 57 60 31.5" 1280 720 SAM706B LF32TU87
Typical ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING Builds (Compare 8,246 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X570-E GAMING - $460

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,527
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback