Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive443% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4  (all builds)
Memory28.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231215
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 14:54
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 189
2-Core 363
111% 211 Pts
4-Core 690
8-Core 1,102
110% 896 Pts
64-Core 1,261
78% 1,261 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 56.7
Reflection 58.7
Parallax 52.4
46% 55.9 fps
MRender 63.5
Gravity 51.9
Splatting 47.8
44% 54.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
765GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2605 3046 3016 2887 1552 1625 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
443% Outstanding
Read 2,413
Write 2,962
Mixed 2,713
SusWrite 2,455
596% 2,636 MB/s
4K Read 83.1
4K Write 221
4K Mixed 124
402% 143 MB/s
DQ Read 1,839
DQ Write 1,353
DQ Mixed 1519
1,156% 1,570 MB/s
Poor: 274%
This bench: 443%
Great: 488%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
288GB free
Firmware: 5L1QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1733 2068 1242 981 975 999 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2,174
Write 2076
Mixed 1,512
SusWrite 1,333
398% 1,774 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 97.6
304% 112 MB/s
DQ Read 1,957
DQ Write 1,448
DQ Mixed 1,638
1,242% 1,681 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 340%
Great: 329%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
538GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 463 464 464 464 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 446
Mixed 437
SusWrite 464
103% 455 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 49.5
184% 70.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
258% 346 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 119%
Great: 133%
Samsung MZ7LM960HMJP-000AZ 960GB
306GB free
Firmware: GXT52W3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 450 452 452 451 451 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 447
Write 440
Mixed 331
SusWrite 451
94% 417 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 41.8
160% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 368
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 330
251% 338 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G4DFRA32A.C8FF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 40.6
MC Mixed 36.8
114% 39.7 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 42.9
SC Mixed 30.2
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 109%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 23.8" 1280 720 DELA09A DELL P2414H
Typical GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4 Builds (Compare 1,333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B660M GAMING X DDR4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $386
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback