PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M S2H 2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190813 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 28 '24 at 13:32 |
Run Duration | 213 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 7% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
65.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 854A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 551.86
|
57.8%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZNLN256HMHQ-000H1 256GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV21H3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 311 311 314 303 310 MB/s
|
90.3%
Outstanding
|
|||
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
59GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 153 75 114 103 72 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
82GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 344 339 83 74 111 MB/s
|
72.2%
Very good
|
|||
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
25GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 136 74 11 49 42 MB/s
|
49.3%
Average
|
|||
Jmicron Generic 256GB
30GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
|
17.8%
Very poor
|
|||
KINGSTON SA400S37240G 240GB
22GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 37 37 38 38 38 MB/s
|
23.4%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
66.5%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 480 | 2 | 60 | 23.5" | 1920 1017 | AOC2470 2470W |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,192x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 686x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 214x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 308x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 209x |
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples | 206x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Excellent | Total price: $354 |