| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 10.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Galaxy A320M Ver1.0 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | GALAX GALAX A320M Ver1.0 |
| Memory | 3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 28 '24 at 08:41 |
| Run Duration | 221 Seconds |
| Run User | IND-User |
| Background CPU | 24% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
59.4%
Above average
|
66% 126 Pts
|
54% 413 Pts
|
23% 366 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.1.1
|
10.7%
Very poor
|
11% 16.7 fps
|
10% 12.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
683GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 122 117 116 142 151 MB/s
|
84%
Excellent
|
93% 127 MB/s
|
122% 0.9 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CB8GU2400.C8ET 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
31.7%
Below average
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
22% 7.67 GB/s
|
32% 124 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 69 | 56 | 100 | 24" | 1280 720 | ACR0C78 EK240Y H |
Typical A320M Ver1.0 Builds (Compare 59 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Galaxy A320M Ver1.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 21x |
| Ryzen 5 3500XAMD $160Bench 82%, 33,544 samples | 7x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 9x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 6x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $275 |