Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X431FL_S431FL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.27% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X431FL_S431FL  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X431FL
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200120
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 08:18
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User KWT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8265U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
53.8% Above average
Memory 78.8
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 126
58% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 192
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 207
13% 207 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX250
Asus(1043 120F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4601
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.27% Terrible
Lighting 12.7
Reflection 20.8
Parallax 15.2
10% 16.2 fps
MRender 15.6
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 0.3
7% 10 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.27%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$58
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 13 7.4 134 12 55 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 783
Write 521
Mixed 512
SusWrite 87.4
106% 476 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 38.5
128% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 192
141% 189 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 85%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
54.2% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 18.9
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 1R 1G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 29% 24 205 55 60 14" 1536 841 NCP0035
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X431FL_S431FL Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X431FL_S431FL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $58
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback