HP Laptop 17-cn0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 17-cn0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 883C
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210401
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '24 at 02:47
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 65.6
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 188
65% 116 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 385
46% 355 Pts
64-Core 441
27% 441 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 883C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
11% Very poor
Lighting 13
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 16.7
11% 15.3 fps
MRender 13.3
Gravity 19
Splatting 11.5
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 11%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KBG40ZNV512G KIOXIA 2TB
838GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN12195 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1495 1453 841 113 132 128 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1,496
Write 1,838
Mixed 1,410
SusWrite 694
306% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 67.8
218% 76.7 MB/s
DQ Read 635
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 330
276% 409 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-XN Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
62.6% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.6
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 15.2
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 17.3" 1280 720 AUOF992
Typical Laptop 17-cn0xxx Builds (Compare 1,139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: HP Laptop 17-cn0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback