Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive157% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1603QA
Memory3.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 20:16
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 43.2
1-Core 149
2-Core 293
81% 162 Pts
4-Core 541
8-Core 890
87% 716 Pts
64-Core 1,088
67% 1,088 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.37
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.2
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 26.6
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 7.5
Gravity 24.3
Splatting 20.4
15% 17.4 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
376GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 811 1005 1047 1244 1277 584 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
157% Outstanding
Read 938
Write 933
Mixed 986
SusWrite 995
218% 963 MB/s
4K Read 39.1
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 38.7
142% 46.5 MB/s
DQ Read 443
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 416
289% 365 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 157%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.3% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 12.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.2
32% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 0P 2R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 31% 16 158 23 60 16" 1280 720 AUO459D
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback