Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics12.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1703ZA
Memory4.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220328
Uptime9.6 Days
Run DateMay 19 '23 at 19:29
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12500H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Memory 58.6
1-Core 179
2-Core 347
100% 195 Pts
4-Core 616
8-Core 960
97% 788 Pts
64-Core 1,321
82% 1,321 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Asus(1043 1EA2) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1369
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 19.1
Parallax 15.2
10% 15.6 fps
MRender 18.8
Gravity 26.6
Splatting 15.8
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GB
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21106000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 255 169 175 173 174 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 871
Write 861
Mixed 732
SusWrite 205
149% 667 MB/s
4K Read 43.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 51.4
185% 65.6 MB/s
DQ Read 551
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 476
344% 451 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 124%
Great: 171%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 10.3
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1703ZA_K1703ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback