HP 14-dv0004np

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP 14-dv0004np  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C9
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220701
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 15:46
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 162
2-Core 308
97% 182 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 653
71% 565 Pts
64-Core 556
34% 556 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
HP(103C 87C9) 128MB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Lighting 23.9
Reflection 23.6
Parallax 20.2
20% 22.6 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.6
6% 7.97 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ1T0HALB-000H1 1TB
665GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS4NFXV Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 308 250 220 229 221 228 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 1,048
Write 400
Mixed 63.2
SusWrite 242
95% 438 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 49.1
176% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 749
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 58.8
175% 389 MB/s
Poor: 105%
This bench: 136%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 21.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 33.2
SC Mixed 17.9
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 80.4
50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 14" 1280 720 LGD060F
Typical 14-dv0004np Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: HP 14-dv0004np

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback