Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M1603QA
Memory3.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230522
Uptime3.7 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 12:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800HS
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 72.6
1-Core 148
2-Core 297
92% 173 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 1,120
102% 856 Pts
64-Core 1,280
79% 1,280 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 5000 (iGPU)
Asus(1043 12AD) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.44.37
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 23.3
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 31.2
19% 23.9 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 26.9
Splatting 21.3
17% 20.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
385GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1164 1277 1280 1297 1312 1222 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,544
Write 1,330
Mixed 1,016
SusWrite 1,258
289% 1,287 MB/s
4K Read 40.7
4K Write 70.9
4K Mixed 49.9
163% 53.8 MB/s
DQ Read 450
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 433
310% 400 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 207%
Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 12GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 14.4
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 20.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 51: 0P 4R 9G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
51% 50% 34 136 57 60 16" 1280 729 AUO459D
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA Builds (Compare 185 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop M1603QA_M1603QA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback