Asus ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive39.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory22.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231211
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 11:42
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$264
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 75.3
1-Core 206
2-Core 413
118% 231 Pts
4-Core 801
8-Core 1,470
136% 1,136 Pts
64-Core 2,826
175% 2,826 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 139
Reflection 129
Parallax 124
113% 131 fps
Gravity 102
Splatting 97.9
88% 99.7 fps
Poor: 90% Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 1.2 25 13 140 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 307
Write 244
Mixed 303
SusWrite 75.9
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 23.2
4K Mixed 14.9
59% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 82.9
DQ Mixed 41.8
46% 77.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 55%
Nvme GIGABYTE GP-GSM2NE3100TNTD 1TB
245GB free
Firmware: EDFME0.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1759 970 571 1648 910 634 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
234% Outstanding
Read 799
Write 486
Mixed 514
SusWrite 1082
162% 720 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 291
4K Mixed 55.9
284% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 976
DQ Write 1,382
DQ Mixed 1,426
1,009% 1,261 MB/s
Poor: 134%
This bench: 234%
Great: 250%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
19GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 213 66 63 102 33 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.9% Above average
Read 259
Write 96.9
Mixed 210
SusWrite 114
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 20.3
85% 31.6 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 116
116% 186 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$45
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 190 196 194 197 195 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 137
Write 170
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 194
106% 145 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
159% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
296GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 128 128 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 119
Mixed 108
SusWrite 128
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Silicon Power Computer & Communications 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
137% Outstanding
MC Read 54.2
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 50.5
151% 52.7 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 27.3
91% 32 GB/s
Latency 93.4
43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 137%
Great: 186%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 62 214 56 165 31.5" 1280 720 AOCB305 Q32G3WG3R3
Typical ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 1,101 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B660-F GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $1,201
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback