Asus X99-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics46.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141016
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 27 '24 at 10:40
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
43.3% Average
Memory 63.3
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 65.5
36% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 302
24% 214 Pts
64-Core 813
50% 813 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.3% Average
Lighting 56
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 58
46% 59.2 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 60
Splatting 52.4
48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 455
Write 184
Mixed 222
63% 287 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 28.1
4K Mixed 21.3
74% 23.5 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 138
114% 169 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 180
Write 166
Mixed 22.2
88% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
140% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 107%
WD Gold 10TB (2016)-$211
4TB free
Firmware: 01.01H02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 218
Write 212
Mixed 95.6
129% 175 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.4
308% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 133%
Apple iPod 2GB
1GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 10
Write 3.2
Mixed 3
6% 5.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
12% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSA.M16FA 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 42.6
118% 41.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 902 430 60 49.5" 1280 720 VIZ1018 M50-E1
Typical X99-A Builds (Compare 1,985 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $744
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback