Asrock H310CM-HDV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	43.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190514
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 26 '24 at 19:39
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	47%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	64.9% Good	Memory 74.5 1-Core 119 2-Core 212 76% 135 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 413 45% 358 Pts	64-Core 438 27% 438 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	43.4% Average	Lighting 56.4 Reflection 57.2 Parallax 48.9 46% 54.2 fps	MRender 41.7 Gravity 51.8 Splatting 46.8 38% 46.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 5GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF400400 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 431 Write 200 Mixed 235 63% 289 MB/s	4K Read 7.5 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 9.8 39% 15.2 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 38.6 DQ Mixed 22.9 31% 59 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 393GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 127 130 129 131 129 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 174 Write 164 Mixed 107 SusWrite 127 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 238% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD480E84-2666E 1x8GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	38.7% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.4 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 12.3 SC Mixed 11.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 79.4 50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	50	19	144	24"	1920 1017	SPT098C Sceptre L24

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 38%

Jet ski

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,315x
Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	1,159x
Core i5-8400Intel $114Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	136x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	574x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	310x
RTX 2060Nvidia $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	267x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	182x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $57Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	135x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	127x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	93x
PSD48G266681 2x8GBPatriotBench 79%, 6,425 samples	82x
CM4X8GD3200C16K2E 2x8GBCorsairBench 84%, 6,228 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $268

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16