OEM X79G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 months ago, 2 months ago.
MotherboardOEM X79G  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220825
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 17:11
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2689 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.2% Good
Memory 68.1
1-Core 67.2
2-Core 136
53% 90.5 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 660
60% 502 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8/500G 500GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0204A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 66 38 68 91 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 1603
Write 38
Mixed 60.6
SusWrite 65.6
92% 442 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 6.2
61% 18.7 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 34.9
DQ Mixed 53.8
76% 150 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 250%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
792GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 78 77 78 76 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 93
Write 68.8
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 77.5
63% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B4G70AM0- 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.8% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.3
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 6.4
20% 6.97 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 22%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 50 75 0" 1280 720
Typical X79G Builds (Compare 354 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: OEM X79G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback