TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock B560M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B560M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210413
Uptime5.3 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 16:42
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User MNG-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Memory 88.2
1-Core 121
2-Core 232
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 730
71% 582 Pts
64-Core 915
57% 915 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 84.4%
 Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Zotac(19DA 7717) ≥ 4GB; zotac rtx 4060 ti
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 551.76
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 253
Parallax 177
128% 196 fps
MRender 312
Gravity 171
Splatting 128
158% 204 fps
Poor: 126% ↑
This bench: 131%
 Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG GAMMIX S11L 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V9002s85
SusWrite @10s intervals: 952 495 90 95 95 91 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,589
Write 890
Mixed 324
SusWrite 303
170% 776 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 78.9
4K Mixed 42.2
146% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 626
DQ Mixed 459
347% 453 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑
This bench: 147%
 Great: 232%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 181 180 177 177 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 128
Mixed 80.8
SusWrite 179
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 99.7%
 Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY Inc 8GBF1X08LFHH35-12-K 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 28.5
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 21.2
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 30.9
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 71.4
56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 92%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 165 27" 1280 720 AUS270E VG279QR
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical B560M Pro4 Builds (Compare 2,916 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M Pro4

CPU
Core i5-11400FIntel  $115Bench 94%, 46,609 samples664x
Core i5-10400FIntel  $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples542x
Core i5-11400Intel  $119Bench 94%, 24,459 samples292x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples415x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia  $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples194x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples162x
SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 224%, 92,081 samples85x
SNVS500G 500GBKingstonBench 186%, 34,043 samples82x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples58x
RAM
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBTeamBench 94%, 22,102 samples133x
KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GBKingstonBench 88%, 58,684 samples124x
DDR4 3200 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 87,891 samples115x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $449
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback