Lenovo 90UT0004US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 121%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 159%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive383% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 90UT0004US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3769
Memory24 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231206
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 02:33
Run Duration284 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13700F-$394
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 87.3
1-Core 214
2-Core 425
126% 242 Pts
4-Core 852
8-Core 1665
149% 1,258 Pts
64-Core 3,019
187% 3,019 Pts
Poor: 116%
This bench: 123%
Great: 125%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Legend(17AA 2090) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3825 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 551.86
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 128
Parallax 134
116% 135 fps
MRender 149
Gravity 110
Splatting 95
94% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 107%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$170
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4536 1842 1392 1377 1381 1386 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
383% Outstanding
Read 2,112
Write 4,609
Mixed 3,488
SusWrite 1,985
694% 3,049 MB/s
4K Read 90.6
4K Write 218
4K Mixed 125
413% 144 MB/s
DQ Read 1,206
DQ Write 986
DQ Mixed 1,148
846% 1,114 MB/s
Poor: 299%
This bench: 383%
Great: 592%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
634GB free
Firmware: M3CR046
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 452 453 452 452 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 388
Write 458
Mixed 391
SusWrite 451
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 77.5
4K Mixed 51.5
170% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 319
DQ Mixed 154
169% 284 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 112%
Great: 125%
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL7 512GB
273GB free
Firmware: EL2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3148 1752 850 851 856 855 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
340% Outstanding
Read 2909
Write 3,173
Mixed 2,927
SusWrite 1,385
585% 2,598 MB/s
4K Read 72.9
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 86.6
284% 92.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,241
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,141
854% 1,140 MB/s
Poor: 161%
This bench: 340%
Great: 419%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 170 171 170 170 171 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 190
Write 169
Mixed 110
SusWrite 170
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
234% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 103%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CP16G60C36U5B.M8D1 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
198% Outstanding
MC Read 83.5
MC Write 76.8
MC Mixed 74
223% 78.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.6
SC Write 52
SC Mixed 32.6
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 69.3
58% 69.3 ns
Poor: 142%
This bench: 198%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 27B2H2
Typical 90UT0004US Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

System: Lenovo 90UT0004US

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $830
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback