Lenovo 20HH000TUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 20HH000TUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HH000TUS
Memory5.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230713
Uptime9.9 Days
Run DateMar 26 '24 at 01:39
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 93.4
2-Core 170
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 442
49% 385 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
Legend(17AA 224D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 538.18
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 19.3
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 23.2
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 15.9
16% 20.4 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LENSE10512GMSP34MEAT2MA 512GB
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.3.2902
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 25 25 26 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 1,757
Write 23
Mixed 31.6
SusWrite 24.3
96% 459 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 20
104% 25 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 102%
Great: 229%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.8% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 20.9
55% 19.2 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 35" 1280 720 AUS3554 ASUS VG35V
Typical 20HH000TUS Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20HH000TUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback