Intel X99-D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics38.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive145% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemINTEL
MotherboardIntel X99-D4  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 25 '24 at 23:08
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 71.7
1-Core 85.7
2-Core 164
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 557
52% 436 Pts
64-Core 833
52% 833 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.09
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
38.5% Below average
Lighting 45.2
Reflection 58
Parallax 74.9
37% 59.4 fps
MRender 58.9
Gravity 54.5
Splatting 43.4
42% 52.3 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HYV256X3(HXY) 256GB
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: APF1M3R1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1990 535 83 85 147 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1017
Write 1,887
Mixed 1,280
SusWrite 487
265% 1,168 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 53.6
171% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 620
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 522
374% 488 MB/s
Poor: 126%
This bench: 145%
Great: 261%
KBM 512GB 512GB
250GB free
Firmware: W0411A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 429 417 418 433 434 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 473
Write 412
Mixed 412
SusWrite 427
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 18.4
100% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 32.8
92% 194 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 97%
WD WD10JPCX-24UE4T0 1TB
908GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 103 103 103 105 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 94.8
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 99.1
65% 88.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52.3% Above average
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 16.4
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 14.5
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 164%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 40 204 57 60 23" 1366 705 GSM59CA 2D HD LG TV
Typical X99-D4 Builds (Compare 14 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Intel X99-D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $130
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback